Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-330 versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") possess different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-330 was released 8 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VR-330 scores against the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic ZS200
VR-330 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus VR-330
ZS200 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | February 2011 | More recent by 85 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Sharper display (+780k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic ZS200
VR-330 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-330 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the VR-330 versus the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and ZS200.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $220 | $800 |