Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Portability
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Panasonic FH25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus VR-330 versus Panasonic FH25, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the FH25 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was announced 2 months after the FH25 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VR-330 grades against the FH25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic FH25
| VR-330 | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus VR-330
| FH25 | VR-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FH25
| VR-330 | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 provides exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FH25 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 versus Panasonic FH25 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 vs the FH25.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and FH25 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and FH25.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic FH25 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
Portrait photography with Panasonic FH25
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
MP count good (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FH25 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
Sports photography with Panasonic FH25
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography info
Panasonic FH25 Travel photography info
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FH25 as a Landscape photography camera
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FH25 Vlogging advice
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Screen LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $220 | $180 |