Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-330 was revealed 23 months later than the FS42 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the VR-330 matches up versus the FS42 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic FS42
| VR-330 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | April 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus VR-330
| FS42 | VR-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FS42
| VR-330 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 has got outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 vs the FS42.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and FS42 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and FS42.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus VR-330 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger VR-330 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $220 | $580 |