Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Released July 2012
  • Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Successor is Panasonic FZ300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-330 was manufactured 17 months earlier than the FZ200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VR-330 scores against the FZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic FZ200

 VR-330 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus VR-330

 FZ200 VR-330 
ReleasedJuly 2012February 2011Newer by 17 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ200

 VR-330 FZ200 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Display resolution460k460kThe same display resolution
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 against the FZ200.

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and FZ200 is 94 and 65 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The picture underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and FZ200.

All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to render more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography highlights
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
48
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
57
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (588 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography details
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
46
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery pack (540 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
55
better than average battery pack (540 per charge)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (588g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography factors
42
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
48
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (540 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging info
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
63
relatively wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic jack
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (588 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus VR-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus VR-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-02-08 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT Color LCD Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 pounds) 588 gr (1.30 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $220 $499