Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") possess different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-330 was brought out 6 years before the FZ2500 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the VR-330 scores versus the FZ2500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic FZ2500
| VR-330 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus VR-330
| FZ2500 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | February 2011 | More recent by 68 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ2500
| VR-330 | FZ2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-330 versus the FZ2500.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and FZ2500.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ2500 will result in more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older VR-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-02-08 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $220 | $998 |