Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44cce/44ccecc06f21be88cbe2c5ec4d2ed5935f92f28a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 front"
82 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 360g - 124 x 84 x 45mm
- Announced January 2009
- Replacement is Panasonic G2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the G1 (12MP) is fairly similar but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and G1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The VR-330 was revealed 2 years after the G1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the VR-330 grades versus the G1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Panasonic G1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic G1
VR-330 | G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G1 over the Olympus VR-330
G1 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic G1
VR-330 | G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G1 has specifications of 124mm x 84mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 360 grams (0.79 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the G1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f496c/f496cfac2375876f2af727d66adf093b9a02b504" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and G1 is 94 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04add/04addb97a4988be7b5f3d689cc9139786c5be2ef" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and G1.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-330 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus VR-330 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer VR-330 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16e67/16e67db34d2eccb8dba472fbf43e24544eb2bfac" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109f6/109f6a11d754f270d09b1482ba8fd140dd4ad8ae" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic G1 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 360g (0.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 84 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 463 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $220 | $0 |