Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Introduced July 2013
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus VR-330 versus Pentax MX-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-330 was announced 3 years before the MX-1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the VR-330 scores vs the MX-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 & Pentax MX-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Pentax MX-1
VR-330 | MX-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus VR-330
MX-1 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2013 | February 2011 | Newer by 29 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Pentax MX-1
VR-330 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 offers outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 versus Pentax MX-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-330 and the MX-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and MX-1 is 94 and 84 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and MX-1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-330 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus VR-330 will produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Pentax MX-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 391 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $220 | $400 |