Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-330 was introduced 18 months later than the CX2 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VR-330 scores vs the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh CX2
| VR-330 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VR-330
| CX2 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh CX2
| VR-330 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 versus the CX2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and CX2 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and CX2.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to give you greater detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher VR-330 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $220 | $341 |