Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
38
Overall
36
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-330 was unveiled 6 months later than the CX4 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the VR-330 matches up versus the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh CX4

 VR-330 CX4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus VR-330

 CX4 VR-330 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh CX4

 VR-330 CX4 
LaunchedFebruary 2011August 2010Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the VR-330 against the CX4.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and CX4 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and CX4.

As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
26
you can focus manually
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography information
46
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography details
69
lighter than others (158g)
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than average in class (205g)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Landscape photography camera
41
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-330
Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
32
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than others (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
30
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh CX4
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-330 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-02-08 2010-08-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 205g (0.45 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $220 $211