Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The VR-330 was introduced 7 months prior to the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the VR-330 grades vs the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 VR-330 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VR-330

 GR Digital IV VR-330 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011February 2011Newer by 7 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 VR-330 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 offers physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-330 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus VR-330 will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Street photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography features
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
better than average battery (390 per charge)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
53
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging details
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-330 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-02-08 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lbs) 190 gr (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $220 $599