Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe VR-330 was introduced 7 months prior to the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the VR-330 grades vs the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-330 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VR-330
GR Digital IV | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | February 2011 | Newer by 7 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-330 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 offers physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 versus the GR Digital IV.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-330 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus VR-330 will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $220 | $599 |