Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-330 was manufactured 8 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VR-330 scores against the GR III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GR III

 VR-330 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus VR-330

 GR III VR-330 
IntroducedSeptember 2018February 2011More modern by 92 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR III

 VR-330 GR III 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Check the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 vs the GR III.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and GR III.

Clearly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography details
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
81
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-330
Street photography with Ricoh GR III
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
supports focus via touch
lighter than competitors (257g)
very good ISO range (102,400)
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
Ricoh GR III Sports photography information
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
supports tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
supports phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competitors (257 grams)
supports focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography information
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
69
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR III Vlogging details
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
37
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (257 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh GR III
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-330 Ricoh GR III
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-02-08 2018-09-25
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 102400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-16
Macro focus range 1cm 6cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 257 gr (0.57 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $220 $900