Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-330 was manufactured 8 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the VR-330 scores against the GR III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GR III
VR-330 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus VR-330
GR III | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | February 2011 | More modern by 92 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GR III
VR-330 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-330 versus Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 vs the GR III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and GR III.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 257 gr (0.57 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $220 | $900 |