Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
38
Overall
36
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-330 was launched 11 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the VR-330 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 VR-330 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011March 2010Fresher by 11 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus VR-330

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC VR-330 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 VR-330 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VR-330 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus VR-330 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern VR-330 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
36
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Street photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography information
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
46
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
low fps (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
69
lighter than average (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
60
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
41
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
47
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging info
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than average (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
28
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-330 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-08 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158g (0.35 lb) 355g (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $220 $349