Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-330 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WG-30W which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VR-330 grades against the WG-30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 & Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| VR-330 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus VR-330
| WG-30W | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 44 months |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh WG-30W
| VR-330 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 against the WG-30W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and WG-30W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and WG-30W.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30W to give you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $220 | $280 |