Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively well matched but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VR-330 was brought out 22 months before the EX2F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the VR-330 grades vs the EX2F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung EX2F
VR-330 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus VR-330
EX2F | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 22 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung EX2F
VR-330 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has proportions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 vs the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55489/5548946bafc751ae7b59ffc66972486c6614b061" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and EX2F is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89147/89147ac1ef953563e74fb68851b039d4cbe9f0ea" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and EX2F.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus VR-330 will give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc637/dc637617a556b608e18bd7f4d58475ba9bcea1db" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40949/4094991b060d0decebfab161a12af49d2bc2712f" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $220 | $478 |