Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VR-330 was brought out 4 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VR-330 matches up versus the GX-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung GX-10
VR-330 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 54 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus VR-330
GX-10 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-10
VR-330 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-330 compared to the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c34b9/c34b9624cbd033002f40053ff610a6b2bf112de3" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and GX-10 is 94 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226f0/226f08a203174e9004ae057c88f9d4a00cbb5dce" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and GX-10.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer VR-330 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3aed/a3aedb105bf0eacced7ede3d62388836fd263925" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/538dc/538dcd650a1941fefdcd54a45384a8808aaf0e77" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung GX-10 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $220 | $850 |