Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-1S, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VR-330 was brought out 5 years later than the GX-1S and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VR-330 scores vs the GX-1S with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung GX-1S
VR-330 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2006 | More recent by 62 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus VR-330
GX-1S | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-1S
VR-330 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung GX-1S in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the VR-330 vs the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7a46/b7a4642c25b560dfa4d2ee9562c6de7f1972f96c" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and GX-1S is 94 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f57/f7f57703c78e64387db1f575d8ad5865446aeba8" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and GX-1S.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus VR-330 will resolve more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher VR-330 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d845/4d84506037aa19088ba6b2bf59964282cd30284b" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0aec1/0aec13b46dd6b18be104f398257fcc3750604644" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung GX-1S |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $220 | $850 |