Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30878/3087870e2a184bb7b129e14c5c1172ecd9956fa4" alt="Samsung NX1000 front Samsung NX1000 front"
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Successor is Samsung NX1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung NX1000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and NX1000 (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and NX1000 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VR-330 was released 14 months earlier than the NX1000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the VR-330 matches up vs the NX1000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung NX1000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung NX1000
VR-330 | NX1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Olympus VR-330
NX1000 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung NX1000
VR-330 | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 features external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1000 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung NX1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-330 compared to the NX1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b4a8/6b4a842bed919183872ae01da5af0e1754e12e53" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and NX1000 is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e363/8e363f1c8afe2797b4488de024a29fe1dd652da9" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and NX1000.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-330 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX1000 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54230/5423031799b221c49e7108d2738945a7a62f0158" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73999/73999e8867b2659356aa144c12f23f9478b2b193" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung NX1000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $220 | $388 |