Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe VR-330 was announced 2 years after the SL102 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VR-330 scores against the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung SL102
| VR-330 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus VR-330
| SL102 | VR-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung SL102
| VR-330 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 compared to the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and SL102.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger VR-330 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $220 | $130 |