Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is IT100
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was brought out 2 years later than the SL820 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the VR-330 scores vs the SL820 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung SL820
| VR-330 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Olympus VR-330
| SL820 | VR-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung SL820
| VR-330 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 comes with exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the VR-330 against the SL820.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and SL820 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and SL820.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger VR-330 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called as | - | IT100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $220 | $280 |
