Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung ST150F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was revealed 23 months before the ST150F which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the VR-330 grades against the ST150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung ST150F
| VR-330 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus VR-330
| ST150F | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung ST150F
| VR-330 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-330 provides outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-330 and the ST150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and ST150F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and ST150F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST150F to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 114 grams (0.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $220 | $300 |