Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
94 Imaging
32 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung TL350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was launched 12 months after the TL350 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VR-330 grades against the TL350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung TL350
| VR-330 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus VR-330
| TL350 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung TL350
| VR-330 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-330 versus the TL350.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and TL350 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and TL350.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus VR-330 to give more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher VR-330 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung TL350 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $220 | $400 |