Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Launched January 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-330 was announced 3 years prior to the WB1100F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the VR-330 scores vs the WB1100F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung WB1100F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung WB1100F
| VR-330 | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Olympus VR-330
| WB1100F | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung WB1100F
| VR-330 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the WB1100F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and WB1100F is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and WB1100F.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB1100F to provide greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 512 gr (1.13 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $220 | $250 |