Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released January 2013
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-330 was revealed 23 months before the DP3 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VR-330 matches up versus the DP3 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
VR-330 | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus VR-330
DP3 Merrill | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2011 | More recent by 23 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
VR-330 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-330 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the VR-330 against the DP3 Merrill.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and DP3 Merrill.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give extra detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $220 | $1,353 |