Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37


57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly comparable but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

The VR-330 was manufactured 14 months before the SD1 Merrill making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VR-330 matches up vs the SD1 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
VR-330 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus VR-330
SD1 Merrill | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
VR-330 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will show greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older VR-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $220 | $2,339 |