Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Older Model is Sigma SD9
- Newer Model is Sigma SD14
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus VR-330 versus Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was revealed 6 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VR-330 grades vs the SD10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Sigma SD10. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sigma SD10
| VR-330 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | March 2004 | Fresher by 84 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 130k | Clearer screen (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus VR-330
| SD10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sigma SD10
| VR-330 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-330 versus Sigma SD10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the VR-330 compared to the SD10.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and SD10 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and SD10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus VR-330 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern VR-330 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VR-330 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $220 | $198 |