Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and A200 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The VR-330 was introduced 2 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VR-330 scores vs the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony A200
VR-330 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2008 | More recent by 32 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus VR-330
A200 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony A200
VR-330 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 has exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/209fd/209fdbb0e571ccadb645a8e4b8bdc4b547bdf329" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and A200 is 94 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09df9/09df9720fe0e03c3b4aa483680217d364c600c39" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and A200.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VR-330 will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger VR-330 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb556/bb5560bd12d4fa1bbfe6a52f923e9306f21b1bf2" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03191/03191c92ba96a5908c29ec724bc574ea521b6a1f" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $220 | $100 |