Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b299f/b299f5a5afefcfe28ea9cd44a81dc7ccf61def89" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front"
67 Imaging
50 Features
50 Overall
50
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Earlier Model is Sony A300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony A330, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and A330 (10MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VR-330 was announced 22 months later than the A330 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the VR-330 matches up against the A330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony A330
VR-330 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 22 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus VR-330
A330 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony A330
VR-330 | A330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-330 offers exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A330 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony A330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 versus the A330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb82c/bb82c8f47497cfcc21db81b5812dafdaa562fd2d" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and A330 is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07cf6/07cf64db14d0bfbe68899e91956d1e1e49a4ab82" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and A330.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-330 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus VR-330 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger VR-330 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5364/a5364d8fc126e6e796335108bac3d984cf809a61" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed785/ed785f089d4e90de3ca642710533e376739ba904" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony A330 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2009-05-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 529 grams (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $220 | $545 |