Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
91 Imaging
46 Features
37 Overall
42
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Revealed September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony QX30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and QX30 (20MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VR-330 was announced 4 years before the QX30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VR-330 matches up vs the QX30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony QX30
| VR-330 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus VR-330
| QX30 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony QX30
| VR-330 | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has specifications of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony QX30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 versus the QX30.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and QX30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and QX30.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony QX30 to deliver greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | None |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $220 | $348 |
