Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-330 was manufactured 11 months prior to the TX200V so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the VR-330 matches up against the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony TX200V
VR-330 | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus VR-330
TX200V | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 11 months | |
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony TX200V
VR-330 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-330 versus Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 against the TX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and TX200V is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and TX200V.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to show extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $220 | $500 |