Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VR-340 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-340 was introduced 12 months later than the XZ-1 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the VR-340 matches up versus the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-340 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus XZ-1
| VR-340 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VR-340
| XZ-1 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Olympus XZ-1
| VR-340 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-340 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the VR-340 versus the XZ-1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and XZ-1 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and XZ-1.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-340 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus VR-340 will result in greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher VR-340 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-340 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $567 |