Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Launched February 2018
  • Also Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is fairly similar but the VR-340 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") offer different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The VR-340 was brought out 7 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-340 matches up vs the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Panasonic ZS200

 VR-340 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus VR-340

 ZS200 VR-340 
LaunchedFebruary 2018January 2012More recent by 74 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display resolution1240k460kClearer display (+780k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic ZS200

 VR-340 ZS200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the VR-340 vs the ZS200.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and ZS200 is 96 and 86 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-340 and ZS200.

Clearly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-340 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-340 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography info
34
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
65
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography information
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (125g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
77
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
includes focus via touch
no moving screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography factors
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
70
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
supports tracking focus
good battery (370 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
76
good battery (370 shots)
supports bluetooth
includes focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography factors
43
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
70
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
good battery (370 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Vlogging camera
33
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic port
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus VR-340Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus VR-340 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Other name - Lumix DC-TZ200
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2012-01-10 2018-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,240k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 340g (0.75 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $130 $800