Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
24
Overall
30

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and FS25 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-340 was announced 2 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the VR-340 grades vs the FS25 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Panasonic FS25

 VR-340 FS25 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2009Fresher by 36 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus VR-340

 FS25 VR-340 

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FS25

 VR-340 FS25 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 has outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has specifications of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 versus the FS25.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and FS25 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-340 and FS25.

As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to result in greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger VR-340 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FS25 Portrait photography details
34
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
26
supports face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography factors
Panasonic FS25 Street photography factors
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FS25 Sports photography highlights
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FS25 Travel photography factors
69
lighter than average (125g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
51
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (29mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
Landscape photography with Panasonic FS25
43
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
32
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (29mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
Panasonic FS25 Vlogging information
33
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than average (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
wide angle not good (29mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FS25
 Olympus VR-340Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus VR-340 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-10 2009-01-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 11
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 29-145mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.80 m 5.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 148g (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $130 $230