Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus VR-340 versus Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-340 was announced 2 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VR-340 scores vs the FS42 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Panasonic FS42
VR-340 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 34 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus VR-340
FS42 | VR-340 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic FS42
VR-340 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-340 versus Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 and the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7849a/7849a207c5c77a41c7ce74a6307429c92057d823" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and FS42 is 96 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da4d4/da4d40dc3bc28877c9499692ccfa4142fe92326e" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and FS42.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-340 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus VR-340 will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer VR-340 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9426/b9426b8e8064c0b1ac2ffae7cc4908f3bbaefa39" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b896/1b896ad2f3f4cac507c1f79c5b0cefff7e1254be" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $130 | $580 |