Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus VR-340 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-340 was introduced 18 months earlier than the WG-3 GPS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the VR-340 grades against the WG-3 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VR-340 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus VR-340
| WG-3 GPS | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VR-340 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-340 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-340 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-340 against the WG-3 GPS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and WG-3 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of files but you should always take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged VR-340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 238g (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $350 |