Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-340 was manufactured 2 years after the CX1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VR-340 grades versus the CX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh CX1
| VR-340 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VR-340
| CX1 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX1
| VR-340 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-340 versus the CX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $130 | $299 |