Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-340 was launched 4 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the VR-340 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VR-340 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VR-340
| WG-5 GPS | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 | January 2012 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VR-340 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the VR-340 against the WG-5 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images though you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older VR-340 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $500 |