Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The VR-340 was launched 4 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the VR-340 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 VR-340 WG-5 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VR-340

 WG-5 GPS VR-340 
AnnouncedFebruary 2015January 2012More recent by 37 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 VR-340 WG-5 GPS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Display resolution460k460kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the VR-340 against the WG-5 GPS.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and WG-5 GPS.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images though you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older VR-340 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography factors
34
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography information
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (236g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography information
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
68
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
weather proof
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (236g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
42
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
54
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Vlogging camera
33
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
34
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of mic jack
heavier than competition in class (236g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
 Olympus VR-340Ricoh WG-5 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-340 Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2012-01-10 2015-02-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.80 m 10.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 236 gr (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $130 $500