Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
39
Overall
40

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-340 was announced 6 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VR-340 scores vs the WG-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-50

 VR-340 WG-50 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus VR-340

 WG-50 VR-340 
ReleasedMay 2017January 2012Newer by 65 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-50

 VR-340 WG-50 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-340 versus the WG-50.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and WG-50.

Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of images but you may want to take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged VR-340 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Portrait photography camera
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
41
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography information
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Sports photography camera
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
49
image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Travel photography camera
68
lighter than others in class (125g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
no Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
environment proof
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography highlights
42
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
48
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging details
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone port
33
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-50
 Olympus VR-340Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-340 Ricoh WG-50
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2012-01-10 2017-05-24
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in On, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 193 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $130 $280