Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-340 versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-340 was brought out 9 years prior to the WG-70 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the VR-340 grades against the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-70

 VR-340 WG-70 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus VR-340

 WG-70 VR-340 
ReleasedFebruary 2020January 2012Newer by 98 months
Focus manually More precise focusing

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-70

 VR-340 WG-70 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VR-340 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-340 versus the WG-70.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The image below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and WG-70.

As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should really consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged VR-340 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-340
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-70
34
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
42
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography information
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography information
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
50
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
environment proof
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography advice
43
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
49
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging information
33
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus VR-340Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-340 Ricoh WG-70
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2012-01-10 2020-02-04
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 193g (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $130 $280