Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Ricoh WG-80 front
Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2022
  • Older Model is Ricoh WG-70
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus VR-340 versus Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-340 was introduced 11 years prior to the WG-80 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VR-340 scores versus the WG-80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh WG-80

 VR-340 WG-80 
Screen size3"2.70"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus VR-340

 WG-80 VR-340 
ReleasedMay 2022January 2012Fresher by 126 months
Manual focus More exact focus

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-80

 VR-340 WG-80 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-340 provides external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 versus Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 vs the WG-80.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and WG-80 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and WG-80.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should really take the release date of the products into consideration. The older VR-340 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-80 Portrait photography advice
34
good megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-80 Street photography factors
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
55
weather proof
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Sports photography camera
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
43
good megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-80 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than average (125 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
71
weather proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-80
43
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
44
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.70")
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging advice
33
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than average (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
31
relatively wide (28mm)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
missing external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh WG-80
 Olympus VR-340Ricoh WG-80
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-340 Ricoh WG-80
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2012-01-10 2022-05-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.70"
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.80 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 193 grams (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $130 $300