Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as ST5500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-340 was launched 2 years after the CL80 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the VR-340 matches up vs the CL80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung CL80
| VR-340 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus VR-340
| CL80 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung CL80
| VR-340 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-340 versus the CL80.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and CL80 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and CL80.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher VR-340 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $400 |