Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
58 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Old Model is Samsung GX-10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung GX-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is relatively similar but the VR-340 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-340 was manufactured 4 years after the GX-20 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the VR-340 scores against the GX-20 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-340 & Samsung GX-20. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung GX-20
| VR-340 | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2008 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus VR-340
| GX-20 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung GX-20
| VR-340 | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 features outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-20 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung GX-20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-340 vs the GX-20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and GX-20 is 96 and 58 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and GX-20.
To sum up, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-340 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer VR-340 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Samsung GX-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Samsung GX-20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2008-01-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4688 x 3120 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 800g (1.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 714 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $850 |