Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47851/478511a8a927c87f7bc64622b7ea2ec44bf09c1b" alt="Samsung HZ15W front Samsung HZ15W front"
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The VR-340 was brought out 2 years after the HZ15W which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the VR-340 scores against the HZ15W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ15W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung HZ15W
VR-340 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus VR-340
HZ15W | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ15W
VR-340 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-340 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-340 vs the HZ15W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23fd5/23fd51ff8d130d286a8f9640d53cbc309e9242b7" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and HZ15W is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff9df/ff9dff2b59476c9b1e3075e3bfc0c862f12900ab" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and HZ15W.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-340 to offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern VR-340 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c99/63c994709dd54a48c3273106d5ff2818bf087503" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27d5e/27d5e3d08b5cd841f9f84a734e1c68f9dd86fc08" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ15W |
Also called as | - | WB550 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $330 |