Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ35W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-340 was released 20 months after the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VR-340 scores against the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung HZ35W
| VR-340 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | June 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VR-340
| HZ35W | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ35W
| VR-340 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the VR-340 vs the HZ35W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and HZ35W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher VR-340 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $130 | $300 |