Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
38
Features
27
Overall
33

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Launched November 2002
  • New Model is Sigma SD10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-340 versus Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-340 was introduced 9 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the VR-340 scores against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sigma SD9

 VR-340 SD9 
LaunchedJanuary 2012November 2002Fresher by 112 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k130kCrisper display (+330k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus VR-340

 SD9 VR-340 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sigma SD9

 VR-340 SD9 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VR-340 versus Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-340 compared to the SD9.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and SD9 is 96 and 54 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and SD9.

To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-340 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus VR-340 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The younger VR-340 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography information
Sigma SD9 Portrait photography information
34
good MP (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
46
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (3MP)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography information
Sigma SD9 Street photography information
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (125g)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
43
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than average in class (950 grams)
low maximum ISO (400)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
Sports photography with Sigma SD9
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
35
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000 seconds)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Travel photography camera
68
lighter than average (125 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
29
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (950 grams)
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography details
Sigma SD9 Landscape photography details
42
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
40
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (3MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
Sigma SD9 Vlogging information
33
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than average (125g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic port
9
no video
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Sigma SD9
 Olympus VR-340Sigma SD9
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus VR-340 Sigma SD9
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2012-01-10 2002-11-26
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 3 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 3200 400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.7 -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 130 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 950 gr (2.09 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $130 $3,001