Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-340 versus Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VR-340 was introduced 9 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the VR-340 scores against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-340 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sigma SD9
| VR-340 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | November 2002 | Fresher by 112 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 130k | Crisper display (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus VR-340
| SD9 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sigma SD9
| VR-340 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-340 versus Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-340 compared to the SD9.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and SD9 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and SD9.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-340 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus VR-340 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The younger VR-340 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-340 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Sigma SD9 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 950 gr (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $3,001 |