Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FP2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and FP2 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-1 was revealed 13 months after the FP2 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the XZ-1 scores vs the FP2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic FP2
| XZ-1 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus XZ-1
| FP2 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FP2
| XZ-1 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has got outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Panasonic FP2 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FP2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the FP2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and FP2 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and FP2.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FP2 will offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer XZ-1 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-26 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $567 | $80 |