Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is relatively close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and FS25 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-1 was announced 2 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 scores versus the FS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic FS25
| XZ-1 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus XZ-1
| FS25 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FS25
| XZ-1 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 comes with outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 and the FS25.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and FS25 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and FS25.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FS25 will render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-01-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $567 | $230 |