Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-1 versus Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is relatively close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and FS25 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-1 was announced 2 years later than the FS25 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 scores versus the FS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic FS25
| XZ-1 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus XZ-1
| FS25 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FS25
| XZ-1 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 comes with outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-1 versus Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 and the FS25.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and FS25 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and FS25.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FS25 will render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-01-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $567 | $230 |