Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and FS42 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-1 was announced 22 months later than the FS42 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the XZ-1 matches up against the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic FS42
XZ-1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 22 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus XZ-1
FS42 | XZ-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FS42
XZ-1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 has got external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 against the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85961/8596193cb37494f70ae08e035372aa35b6fb43f5" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and FS42 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05417/0541791532d10b86db42fec123cea9d91c47f223" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The graphic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-1 features the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The newer XZ-1 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf47/8bf476bfc0b3c5be233f3d30855c8af81bcfdaa7" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37a51/37a51dc33eff1d2993865e5248b698ad2fa955de" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 132g (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $567 | $580 |