Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and FZ200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-1 was released 17 months prior to the FZ200 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-1 matches up against the FZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic FZ200
XZ-1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus XZ-1
FZ200 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic FZ200
XZ-1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 and the FZ200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and FZ200 is 88 and 65 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and FZ200.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ200 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | OLED | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 588 grams (1.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | 117 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 540 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $567 | $499 |