Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FT1
- Updated by Panasonic TS2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic TS1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the TS1 (12MP) is relatively close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and TS1 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-1 was revealed 2 years later than the TS1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the XZ-1 scores against the TS1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic TS1
| XZ-1 | TS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus XZ-1
| TS1 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic TS1
| XZ-1 | TS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Panasonic TS1 has dimensions of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic TS1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 and the TS1.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and TS1 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and TS1.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic TS1 will result in extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lb) | 189 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $567 | $380 |