Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and ZR3 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and ZR3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-1 was brought out 13 months after the ZR3 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-1 matches up against the ZR3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Panasonic ZR3
| XZ-1 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus XZ-1
| ZR3 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Panasonic ZR3
| XZ-1 | ZR3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 features external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 vs the ZR3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and ZR3 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and ZR3.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZR3 will provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern XZ-1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2010-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $567 | $280 |